FIRST-PARTY & CATASTROPHE CLAIMS
FIRST-PARTY & CATASTROPHE CLAIMS
What Sets Us Apart
We have years of in-depth experience consulting with carrier on how to address catastrophe losses such as tornadoes, hail, wind, and water.
What Sets Us Apart
We have years of in-depth experience consulting with carrier on how to address catastrophe losses such as tornadoes, hail, wind, and water.
Results
We received a defense verdict based on the vandalism exclusion in a lawsuit brought by the owners of a home which allegedly caught fire from errant fireworks.
We prevailed at trial in a claim brought by a beauty supply store owner who reported tens of thousands of dollars of merchandise stolen.
The Appellate Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that policy language controls the question of whether a misrepresentation under one coverage part voids coverage for the entire loss.
The Appellate Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling in favor of our client, holding the “innocent insured” defense is trumped by policy language.
We received summary judgment in a theft and vandalism claim worth hundreds of thousands of dollars based on the contractual suit-filing limitation.
The Appellate Court reinstated a jury verdict, holding that a material misrepresentation by an insured removes any obligation for the insurer to cover a loss.
We received summary judgment after proving an insured falsified receipts.
We received summary judgment by asserting the policy’s earth-moving exclusion in a claim worth more than three-quarters of a million dollars.
Results
We received a defense verdict based on the vandalism exclusion in a lawsuit brought by the owners of a home which allegedly caught fire from errant fireworks.
We prevailed at trial in a claim brought by a beauty supply store owner who reported tens of thousands of dollars of merchandise stolen.
The Appellate Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that policy language controls the question of whether a misrepresentation under one coverage part voids coverage for the entire loss.
The Appellate Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling in favor of our client, holding the “innocent insured” defense is trumped by policy language.
We received summary judgment in a theft and vandalism claim worth hundreds of thousands of dollars based on the contractual suit-filing limitation.
The Appellate Court reinstated a jury verdict, holding that a material misrepresentation by an insured removes any obligation for the insurer to cover a loss.
We received summary judgment after proving an insured falsified receipts.
We received summary judgment by asserting the policy’s earth-moving exclusion in a claim worth more than three-quarters of a million dollars.
Most Common Question
What value do you bring to a client evaluating a catastrophe claim?
Answer
We have handled hundreds of weather-related claims. Our depth of experience gives us insight few law firms can claim.
Most Common Question
What value do you bring to a client evaluating a catastrophe claim?
Answer
We have handled hundreds of weather-related claims. Our depth of experience gives us insight few law firms can claim.