Received a defense verdict based on the vandalism exclusion in a lawsuit brought by the owners of a home which allegedly caught fire from errant fireworks.

Prevailed at trial in a claim brought by a beauty supply store owner who reported tens of thousands of dollars of merchandise stolen.
Appellate Court affirmed the Trial Court’s ruling that policy language controls the question of whether a misrepresentation under one coverage part voids coverage for the entire loss.
Appellate Court affirmed the Trial Court’s ruling in favor of our client, holding the “innocent insured” defense is trumped by policy language.
Received summary judgment in a theft and vandalism claim worth hundreds of thousands of dollars based on the contractual suit-filing limitation.
The Appellate Court reinstated a jury verdict, holding that a material misrepresentation by an insured removes any obligation for the insurer to cover a loss.
Received summary judgment after proving an insured falsified receipts.
Received summary judgment by asserting the policy’s earth-moving exclusion in a claim worth more than $3.75 million dollars.